![]() ![]() No general orthographic effects were observed in the L2 or L1 groups, but a significant effect of proficiency was observed for orthographic overlap over time: higher proficiency L2 listeners used also orthographic information in the matching task in a time-window from 400 to 700 ms, whereas no such effect was observed for lower proficiency listeners. A general phonological effect was observed in the L2 listener group but not in the L1 control group. ) and of an identical phonological overlap. ) or shorter word initial orthographic overlap ( vs. In Experiment 2, target words were contrasted with competitors of either longer ( vs. ) or a shorter word initial phonological overlap ( vs. In Experiment 1, French target words were contrasted with competitors having a longer ( vs. The use of orthographic and phonological information in spoken word recognition was studied in a visual world task where L1 Finnish learners of L2 French ( n = 64) and L1 French native speakers ( n = 24) were asked to match spoken word forms with printed words while their eye movements were recorded. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |